Hi Jordan,
I'm trying to wrap my head around muscle protein synthesis.
You've written elsewhere that MPS rates are elevated about 48-72 hours after a workout, depending on a number of factors, and hence high-frequency programming approaches are better for hypertrophy (assuming sufficient training advancement, work capacity, and so on). If volume (which I understand to be the main determiner of hypertrophy) is held constant, how much does frequency matter?
For example, consider the following two plans.
Plan A:
M: Curls 3x8
W: Off
F: Curls 3x8
Plan B:
M: Curls 2x8
W: Curls 2x8
F: Curls 2x8
Volume is the same, and let us stipulate everything besides frequency is too (intensity, rest periods, etc.).
Based on your comments, I would expect Plan B to be slightly more effective for producing bicep gainzzz. Is this correct, and would the difference be large enough to be practically significant?
Thanks,
Patrick
I'm trying to wrap my head around muscle protein synthesis.
You've written elsewhere that MPS rates are elevated about 48-72 hours after a workout, depending on a number of factors, and hence high-frequency programming approaches are better for hypertrophy (assuming sufficient training advancement, work capacity, and so on). If volume (which I understand to be the main determiner of hypertrophy) is held constant, how much does frequency matter?
For example, consider the following two plans.
Plan A:
M: Curls 3x8
W: Off
F: Curls 3x8
Plan B:
M: Curls 2x8
W: Curls 2x8
F: Curls 2x8
Volume is the same, and let us stipulate everything besides frequency is too (intensity, rest periods, etc.).
Based on your comments, I would expect Plan B to be slightly more effective for producing bicep gainzzz. Is this correct, and would the difference be large enough to be practically significant?
Thanks,
Patrick
Comment