Originally posted by DorianStarbuck
View Post
The only addition I have is regarding this statement: "I have a Chiropractor that I have used for many years, and he has always identified it as a "rib" that needs "an adjustment". With no exceptions, his adjustment, which is always the same procedure (stand behind me, take my left elbow in hand as I bend my left arm, and abruptly yank my left arm toward my left shoulder), cause the pain to completely disappear by two days later, no matter how intense it is when I go to him for an adjustment."
The contextual effects of treatment are a major factor in such situations. We usually call such situations placebo-like contextual effects but there's a push to move away from the term placebo. Also, what you are describing is conditioning based on prior experiences and held beliefs about the perceived issue and required intervention to "fix" the issue. This is a common line of thinking. As JHG stated, there is high probability for self-resolution with time and minimizing awareness to the issue, while maintaining activity. Often when we experience pain our thought process is something is wrong that necessitates fixing - which elicits seeking a provider to find and fix the perceived problem. Not to go too far down this rabbit hole, but this can play a major role in perpetuating scenarios you are presenting (persistent, re-occurring pain). Ultimately this gets to the core of the issue - a false premise pain = bad = tissue damage. Happy to discuss further.
Leave a comment: