The Bridge 1.0 vs. 2.0

[SchneeVonGestern]

I finished NLP 3 months ago and have since followed a modified Andy Baker H/L 4-day split. I plan to start running The Bridge soon. Which one should I choose? Is 2.0 an updated version of 1.0, and thus the preferred template, or would it typically be preferable to initially run 1.0 and later run 2.0?

[SchneeVonGestern]

Never mind. Just saw the answer from Leah.

[cycleofone]

Can you link to the post that answered your question?

[SchneeVonGestern]

https://forum.barbellmedicine.com/forums/training-q-a-with-dr-jordan-feigenbaum-and-dr-austin-baraki/13607-bridge1-0-or-2-0

[aad74]

I’m personally going to try both to see how I react to each. I have no idea what the difference is but I’m sure they are both great.

[Bear_Bryan]

I’m personally going to try both to see how I react to each. I have no idea what the difference is but I’m sure they are both great.

The Bridge 2.0 has heavy singles throughout, some different variations, and some direct arm work.

[aad74]

Sounds very interesting. I’m not sure if I should go straight from 1 to 2 or try another template between. Possibly a HT template to add a little more mass. Not too bothered with arm work but some tricep work could help my pressing.

[leGDE]

Why dont you just do 1 and then 2 as usual?