I noticed with back off sets you like to program an @8 or @9 for after the heavy single. Is their a reason for this over just going straight into the % based back offs? I’m assuming the average intensity changes but what other factor come into play?
Thank you.
We program singles to train the specific characteristics needed to get better at singles. Plus, they serve as a good way to ballpark performance potential for the day.
I think you can get a better prediction of performance potential when there are multiple “tests”, especially when singles are a new addition. The 4 @ 9 set (in this example) is also useful for driving low velocity strength performance, right?
There are pros and cons to both approaches, of course.