Yea, we’ve seen this, but thanks for bringing it up!
On the plus side, they do provide specific examples of movements in the paper. On the negative, their specific recommendations for programming are not great and are copy/pasta of the existing guidelines…but still without any sort of program. They also did not take the opportunity to actually comment on areas within their purview that are currently grey, e.g. RT after MACE, RT in with well managed heart failure, and so on.