Bodybuilding and Low-rep strength training

In Arnold’s Schwarzenegger’s The New Encyclopedia of Modern Bodybuilding (pgs. 142-144), he states “…unless you include low-rep strength training, you will never achieve the hardness and density necessary to create a truly first-class physique … ‘If you don’t do heavy lifts,’ my friend Dr. Franco Columbu explains, ‘it shows immediately onstage. There is a soft look that shows itself clearly.’ There is abundant scientific and physiological evidence for why this is so. Power training puts tremendous strain on relatively few fibers at a time, causing them to become bigger and thicker (hypertrophy), and they also become packed much tighter together. This contributes enormously to that hard, dense look of the early champions … With high-rep training only, much of the growth is the result of transient factors such as fluid retention and glycogen storage, but muscle made as hard as a granite wall through power training comes as a result of an actual increase in muscle fiber size.”

On page 146, Arnold recommends picking one body part once or twice a week and testing out “your maximum strength”.

At the risk of blasphemy against the GOAT, this seems a bit outdated.

I was wondering if there are any true benefits of going heavy (I guess we can interpret this as <5 reps @9-10) for bodybuilders?

While low rep, maximal strength training can indeed produce hypertrophy…the amount of fatigue it produces per “unit” hypertrophy probably isn’t favorable enough to keep it in the program year-round for a bodybuilder. Note the absence of citations in that book.

1 Like