I’m not sure what the point of such a claim / debate is to be honest. “Superior” for what outcome?
The adductor magnus is likely to be involved to a significant degree in the deadlift as a hip extensor. Conversely, squats involve minimal utilization of the hamstrings, which are a significant component of the “posterior chain” involved in the deadlift.
Why would necessarily make one superior to the other?
Again – this has implications for the specificity of adaptation, but I’m not sure it makes one “superior” to the other. The range of motion of the squat (assuming they’re talking about a squat taken to just below parallel) is somewhat arbitrary, as is the range of motion of a deadlift (which is defined as a consequence of the completely arbitrary 45 cm diameter of standard weight plates).