Hi guys,
I found Lyle McDonald’s recent article hugely interesting:
https://bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/research-review-training/resistance-training-volume-enhances-muscle-hypertrophy-research-review.html/
Here is his conclusion:
“But what I don’t think this study in any way supports is a dose response relationship between volume and growth with 45 freaking sets/week being necessary or even useful. The other study that just came out showed a cap at 20 sets/week. The Ostrowski triceps data showed that 12-14 sets/week worked as well as 28 sets/week even if Brad’s discuss (seemingly deliberately) misrepresented it. Even the Vl/RF data is hampered hugely by the difference in starting size in both studies: the highest volume group started out the smallest and only caught up to the others.”
So I was left wondering about a few things after this:
What do you guys think about this criticism of the dose response between volume and hypertrophy?
In particular, is there a cap to the effective amount of volume in a persons training or is this still going to be subject to an individual’s training sensitivity over the long term?
And will this affect the current BBM model of programming?
Thanks in advance for the answers and I’ve been loving all the Q&As and content you guys have been putting out, keep up the great work!