Dieting "Meta-Cycles" and LBM Increases

Doctor J,

I am having a hard time finding research on this question due to the inability to really formulate a google-able (I’ll say it’s a word if you say it’s a word) question. Essentially, gaining lean body mass tends to require a net surplus in calories in general, and losing weight requires a net deficit. Are there hard boundaries on where this “net” occurs? Here is the thought experiment so you can see my (probably flawed) attempt to understand how this works…

Say a person eats today in a surplus, but tomorrow eats in a deficit. If he does this such that the mean is 0, then generally he neither loses nor gains weight. Now say that person eats a surplus this week and a deficit the next week. Again the mean is 0. So the net of those two weeks is again that he is back at the same weight he started. Now if he eats in a surplus for a year, and then a deficit for a year…blah blah blah… again the mean comes to 0. At what point does the body “sense” that he is in a state of surplus or deficit such that it know to prioritize LBM gain over fat gain? Does the body have some amount of time it is required to assess calorie consumption? In my mechanical-thinking mind, there are an infinite amount of cycles for calories that you could examine. Therefore, the body could prioritize by the day and you could be doing mini bulk/cut cycles everyday and making gains, or your body might require a year of bulk and a year of cut to make gains…

Hopefully that makes sense enough to impart some juicy nuance…

Yea we don’t really have any hard cutoffs here. The closest any data has really gotten here is looking at folks who do intermittent fasting using an alternate day or 1-day-a-week fasting protocol (or similar). In this case, the weekly calorie intake tends to drive weight changes when present. Many people in these studies maintained weight via eating overall at maintenance throughout the week.

The way I like to think about this is like driving a car cross-country. You want to get to drive to west coast where LBM (sun and warmth) abounds, preferably SoCal. If you go take the wrong interstate however, eg too much surplus, you’ll end up in Seattle. It’s still the west coast, but it’s not usually very warm and sunny. Alternatively, if you get lost taking surface streets and back roads (alternating surplus and deficits) you might never make it! What we’d like to do is take a slow, but steady approach towards the West coast- constantly going in the right direction unless we have car trouble, e.g. our waist circumference or other health metric tells us to check the engine.

In sum, I think weekly and monthly “nets” end up being more indicative of which direction you’re headed compared to daily or yearly nets.

Hope that makes sense.

-Jordan

3 Likes